This is the html version of the file http://www.lorenzinifoundation.org/download/whm/cap3.pdf.
G o o g l e automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:mewUlYjQzxcJ:www.lorenzinifoundation.org/download/whm/cap3.pdf+Kupperman+menopausal+Index&hl=en


Google is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.
These search terms have been highlighted:  kupperman  menopausal  index 

Page 1
43
C
HAPTER
3: S
YMPTOMS AND THE
M
ENOPAUSE
1. Conflicting findings regarding which symptoms are related to hormonal
changes of menopause reflect different research methodologies and their
limitations.
2. When symptom checklists are used, middle-aged women are highly
symptomatic.
3. Age related symptoms may be differentiated from those related to the
menopausal phase.
4. Only vasomotor symptoms, vaginal atrophic symptoms, and breast tender-
ness consistently vary with the phase of the menopause transition and are
significantly affected by the administration of hormones in double blind
RCTs [A].
5. Other symptoms, such as insomnia and mood, may be affected by the
presence of bothersome vasomotor symptoms.
6. Symptoms are influenced by psychosocial and lifestyle factors.
Lorraine Dennerstein, A.O., M.B.B.S., Ph.D., F.R.A.N.Z.C.P., D.P.M.;* Janet Guthrie, M.Sc., Dip. Ed. Ph.D.;
Martin
Birkhäuser, M.D.;
Sherry Sherman, Ph.D.
§
K
EY
P
OINTS
a
* From the Office for Gender and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia.
From the Office for Gender and Health, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne,
Australia.
From the Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Bern, Switzerland.
§
From the Clinical Endocrinology and Osteoporosis Research Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Bethesda, MD U.S.A.
a
Evidence categories are given in square brackets. A = randomized controlled trials (rich body of data); B = randomized controlled trials (limited data);
C = nonrandomized trials and observational epidemiologic studies; D = Panel expert judgement. (See also table 1–1).
Conflicting findings
regarding which
symptoms are related
to hormonal changes
of menopause reflect
different research
methodologies and
their limitations.

Page 2
44
1. I
NTRODUCTION
A large number of symptoms have been variously
linked with the menopause transition. Important
clinical questions include the following:
1. What are the most frequent symptoms experi-
enced by middle-aged women?
2. Which of these are related to the hormonal
events reflected in the different phases of the
menopausal transition, and which relate to aging?
3. What is the role of other psychosocial and
lifestyle factors in determining women’s experi-
ence of symptoms?
4. What evidence is there for the effectiveness of
treatment interventions for symptoms linked to
the transition to menopause?
2. Q
UALITY OF
L
IFE AND
S
YMPTOMS
The term “quality of life” refers to
a subjective perception on the part
of both researcher and subject.
Areas covered range from health
status (SF–36),
1
life satisfaction,
2
coping,
3
and depression (Center
for Epidemiologic Studies
Depression scale)
4
to scales mea-
suring symptoms thought to be characteristic of
specific states, such as menopause. This breadth of
coverage and absence of a single, widely accepted
definition may be a limiting feature of the concept
of quality of life.
5
There are two different types of
measures: global quality of life or aspects specific
to a particular disease (such as osteoporosis) or a
physiological state such as the hormonal changes
underlying the menopause transition. Scales
designed to measure the latter make the assump-
tion that the more symptoms are present and the
more severe those symptoms are, the lower is the
ensuing quality of life. Yet there has been surpris-
ingly little research linking symptom presence with
the other more global aspects of quality of life
described above.
There is debate as to whether the term “sign” or
“symptom” should be used when referring to the
events of the menopausal transition. The term
“sign” is often used to refer to objective clinical
manifestation of a disease, such as a lump or a
bruit, whereas the term “symptoms” is used to
refer to those bodily perceptions presented as
complaints by the individual. This chapter uses the
term “symptom” in this context.
3. M
ETHODOLOGICAL
A
SPECTS OF
M
EASURING
S
YMPTOMS
Conflicting findings as to the etiology of symp-
toms in midlife reflect some of the methodological
difficulties inherent in menopause research as well
as specific issues pertaining to the measurement of
symptoms, such as sample selection, validity of
symptom measures, age at baseline and length of
followup, separation of the effects of the natural
menopausal transition from that of induced
menopause, statistical and experimental design.
The most obvious methodological issue is the
potential to confuse studies evaluating the effects
of estrogen or differences between estrogen users
and nonusers on various outcomes as “studies of
menopause.” In order to distinguish menopause-
related changes (due to changes from altered levels
of estrogen and/or other sex hormones) from those
of aging or disease, it is necessary to elucidate the
processes of the transition from premenopause to
postmenopause. Although there is an abundance
of studies and findings on the effects of ERT on
various physiological and psychological outcomes,
the actual processes and mechanisms of follicular
depletion which underlie the transition to
menopause are poorly understood.
3.1 Study Type
Clearly a number of different research modes can
be used to explore whether the menopause transi-
tion affects quality of life, varying from studies of
primates (often involving extirpative surgery and
then hormonal intervention), to clinical trials of
Symptoms are
influenced by
psychosocial and
lifestyle factors.

Page 3
45
women who may have reached natural menopause
or had menopause induced. However, clinical
experience is based on a small proportion of self-
selecting, predominantly ill women and may not
be representative of most women’s experience of
the menopause.
6,7
Population-based studies have
demonstrated that women who seek treatment
differ in systematic ways from those who do not.
6,7
Patient-based samples are biased in terms of
education, socioeconomic status, other health
problems, and incidence of general depression.
8
Clinical trial samples often included women who
had undergone surgical menopause, and the hor-
mones administered were usually synthetic, so
these studies do not inform us of the relationship
of symptoms to the natural menopause transition.
Only studies of women derived randomly from
the general population provide findings which
can be confidently generalized to be the experience
of most women of that particular culture and
geographic location. Reliable transcultural compar-
isons are rare because rating scales and question-
naires cannot be easily translated to other languages:
a specific term may not exist in the target language
or may have a slightly different meaning. This
problem exists even for translations within the
group of western languages and points to the
importance of validation.
There are intercultural and intracultural differences
in symptom reporting. Kaufert and Syrotuik
9
describe how stereotypes held by differing social
and cultural groups act as a framework within which
an individual can select and organize and label
experience. Moreover, in menopause research there
is a risk that stereotypes will become operative
whenever subjects know the topic of the research.
3.2 Rating Scales
Health outcomes and their determinants can be
measured by validated rating scales. The failure to
use adequately validated scales has been a major
problem in menopause research. In the classical
Kuppermann Menopausal Index,
10
a numerical
summation of 11 menopausal complaints derived
from clinical experience in New York in the 1950s,
as well as in other rating scales, the importance of
“neurovegetative symptoms” is overestimated,
whereas other changes are neglected. This particu-
larly applies to the measurement of sexuality and
of symptom experience. For example, with regard
to sexuality, relatively few of the population-based
studies of the menopause transition have made any
inquiry about sexual functioning. Differing mea-
sures of sexual functioning have been used but
studies often fail to offer any data on the validity
or reliability of these measures in their local popu-
lation. The research process itself may result in
response bias. This includes interviewer bias in the
phrasing of questions and specification bias if the
variable under study is not well specified to the full
understanding of the subject.
3.3 Symptom Measure
A major methodological issue is that of the symp-
tom measure utilized and its validity and reliability
for the cultural group studied. The standard
method used for collecting information on the
prevalence and severity of symptoms has been a
checklist of symptoms. But the checklist in itself
introduces a number of biases, including the prob-
lem of elicitation. For example, Wright,
11
inter-
viewing women of the Navajo tribe, found that vir-
tually all respondents reported no bodily changes
since menopause in relation to open-ended ques-
tions, but most responded positively to symptoms
in the checklist. Holte
12
noted that the sounder the
methodology, the lower the prevalence of symp-
toms. When frequency or bothersomeness of com-
plaint are included, the reporting rate goes down
further: irritability was reported by 57 percent of
premenopausal women as being present occasion-
ally, but only 10 percent of the same women
reported that it was there frequently.
12
The presence
of symptoms “occasionally” does not indicate their
impact on the woman and may not be clinically
relevant or indicative of treatment needs. Porter et
al.
13
assessed the impact and prevalence of symp-

Page 4
46
toms in a Scottish postal survey of 6,096 women
aged 45–54. Fifty-seven percent of the cohort had
experienced a hot flush, but only 22 percent said
that it had been a problem. Similar disparity exist-
ed for night sweats (55 percent and 24 percent)
and dry vagina (34 percent and 14 percent). Only
4 percent had experienced none of the symptoms.
The most frequently used checklist has been based
on a numerical summation of 11 menopausal com-
plaints, the Kupperman Menopausal Index, derived
from clinical experience in New York in the 1950s.
The index was a combination of self-report and
physician ratings. The index included 11 symp-
toms (vasomotor, paraesthesia, insomnia, nervous-
ness, melancholia, vertigo, weakness (fatigue),
arthralgia and myalgia, headaches, palpitations and
formication) rated on a 4-point scale. In a critical
review, Alder
14
noted that terms were ill defined,
categories included overlapping scores, and scores
were summed without being based on independent
factors. Symptoms seemed to be arbitrarily select-
ed; omitted were measures of vaginal dryness, dys-
pareunia, and breast tenderness. The following
year Kupperman and coworkers, including Blatt,
15
described a modification, which allowed for some
symptoms to be weighted more than others.
Weighting was used without statistical justifica-
tion. Later, investigators, such as Neugarten and
Kraines,
16
extended the list to 28 symptoms but
found that only 9 of these distinguished
menopausal women from those at other develop-
mental phases. These authors, and many since,
arbitrarily categorized groups of symptoms.
Greene
17
was the first to use factor analysis as the
basis for categorizing symptoms into three factors,
vasomotor, somatic, and psychological. But
Greene’s study contained a number of flaws.
Although his 30-symptom list was constructed
from the scale of Neugarten and Kraines,
16
he
failed to include breast pain, somewhat curiously
as Neugarten and Kraines had found this symptom
to be associated with menopausal women. Nor did
he include symptoms of vaginal atrophy. These
symptoms (mastalgia and atrophy) were still not
included in a later amended 20-item list.
18
Whether psychological complaints vary with the
menopause transition has been a key concept, yet
the capacity of most symptom checklists to ade-
quately measure psychological morbidity is
unknown.
9
In their Manitoba study, symptoms
measuring psychological morbidity had to conform
to scales used by psychological epidemiologists,
and concurrent validity was sought. The symptom
checklist was not restricted to items with an asso-
ciation with menopause but was embedded in an
18-item general symptom list adapted from one
used in a community health survey. The 11 symp-
toms forming the menopausal index were derived
from the International Health Foundation studies
(hot flush, night sweats, dizziness, rapid heart beat,
pins and needles in hands and feet, tiredness, irri-
tability, headaches, depression, nervous tension,
and insomnia). Interestingly, the list did not
include vaginal atrophy symptoms, yet the
International Health Foundation list was supposed-
ly chosen as a “succinct summary of the core
symptoms as described in the clinical literature.”
Four factors were found. Hot flushes and night
sweats group together as a separate factor, and five
symptoms burdened on a psychological factor.
These were five of the six symptoms in the
International Health Foundation arbitrary classifi-
cation of “symptoms of the nervous system.” A
strong association was found between the five psy-
chological symptoms and the two standardized
measures of psychological morbidity used for con-
current validity.
Greene
18
compared the findings of seven factor
analytic studies. Despite different methodologies
and sampling, he found that vasomotor symptoms
(hot flushes, night sweats) always formed a sepa-
rate cluster, totally independent of other symptoms.
There was also agreement that a number of symp-
toms cluster together to form a general somatic or
perhaps psychosomatic factor: pressure or tight-
ness in head or body, muscle and joint pains,

Page 5
47
numb-tingling feelings, headaches, feeling dizzy or
faint, breathing difficulties, and loss of feeling in
hands or feet. A further group of symptoms cluster
together to form a psychological factor, which in
some studies can be subdivided into anxiety and
depression.
3.4 Cross-Sectional Versus
Longitudinal Design
As indicated above, observational studies of popu-
lation-based samples are the best way to determine
the symptom experience of women in relationship
to the phases of the natural menopause transition.
However, they often suffer from being cross-sec-
tional in design
19
rather than having the power of
longitudinal analysis of the same women through
the menopause transition.
20
Cross-sectional studies
can only indicate whether associations exist and
are unable to determine causality. Cross-sectional
studies have certain advantages. They are more
convenient and less expensive to carry out.
Subjects are only asked to participate on one occa-
sion so that the response rate is likely to be higher
than when subjects are asked to contribute time for
assessments on a regular basis. Those who accept
to participate in a longitudinal study may differ in
certain systematic ways from those who decline
and this may introduce bias into the sample.
21
Thus, the sample participating in a cross-sectional
study may be more similar to a general population
sample than that of a longitudinal study sample.
Splintering of the study population can continue
for other reasons during the accrual process.
22
From the target group, only those persons available
to the investigator are potentially eligible for study.
Further splintering occurs after applying inclusion
and exclusion criteria. After being admitted to the
study, the subject’s records must be properly filled
in: missing data on some variables can lead to
exclusion of the subject with some analytic tech-
niques. If the reason for drop-out or premature
early termination of the study is related to the stud-
ied endpoint, this can induce further bias. Another
source of error is that of confounding, which
necessitates the need for multivariate analytic
methods to control for the influence of the various
factors that can affect an outcome. The majority of
community-based studies have been cross-sectional
and thus limit researchers to inferring apparent
associations. Cross-sectional studies cannot control
for premenopausal characteristics nor separate the
effects of aging from those of menopause.
These studies are less satisfactory than longitudinal
studies in which the same women are followed
over time with the same instruments, so that what
is being observed is change in the same population
with time. Longitudinal cohort designs facilitate
the identification of causal pathways and allow the
effects of aging to be disentangled from those of
menopause.
8
However, most longitudinal studies
have used inadequate statistical methods, often
resorting to a cross-sectional approach to data,
which, as repeated measures, are no longer inde-
pendent in nature.
23
Longitudinal collection of
data reduces reliance on memory for long recall
periods. The length of the recall period in cross-
sectional studies can lead to further inaccuracy of
data. This is not only true for the studied end-
points, but also for possible covariates at the time
of occurrence. In longitudinal studies, there is the
opportunity for measures to be made prospectively
(such as menstrual diaries) rather than relying on
self-recall, which may be substantially less accu-
rate. When change over time is the key concern, a
prospective design is mandatory.
3.5 Statistical Analysis
Most studies have only utilized univariate analysis
and thus been unable to take into account the role
of confounding or interacting factors. The findings
of these studies are thus often contradictory. A
major problem in the longitudinal studies has been
the lack of a sensitive enough statistical analysis,
which would use a within-subject-repeated-measures
method, allowing for the various factors which
may affect the quality-of-life measure, changes in
those factors, and interactions with the menopausal
transition to be identified.
23

Page 6
48
The analysis of longitudinal studies becomes more
complex as the temporal dimension is added to the
other possible components of the study. Many sta-
tistical approaches are possible. A simple and pow-
erful technique is to calculate mean values prior to
and following an event such as the FMP. To allow
for the influence of multiple factors, linear regres-
sion is preferred to logistic regression where con-
tinuous data are available. For more information
about evolution in time, more complex techniques
are needed. A suitable technique is repeated
measures multivariate analysis of variance using
a number of contrasts to estimate various effects.
Simple split plot or randomized block designs
cannot be recommended as they often violate com-
pound symmetry assumptions. For series involving
more than 100 observations for each subject, time
series and spectral analysis techniques should be
considered. Structural equation modeling is recom-
mended for examination in detail of a range of
factors that may influence the studied endpoint, the
presence of feedback and of latent or nonmeasur-
able variables.
In reviewing the extensive observational literature
in this field accessible in Medline, we will concen-
trate on those studies which use adequate study
design.
24
These include random sampling; describ-
ing the study as a general health survey, so that
bias caused by emotional response to menopause is
lessened; collecting information on current symp-
tomatology, so that the problem of recall bias is
minimized; utilizing an age range that encompasses
the menopause transition, for example, 45–55
years for cross-sectional studies or a younger
(mean) age group for longitudinal studies of the
menopause transition, to ensure that women are
premenopausal at outset; longer followup in longi-
tudinal studies; and collection of data on menstrual
status, hormone usage, and induced menopause, so
that the phase of the menopause transition can be
adequately determined. Where there are method-
ological problems such as poor response rate, these
are outlined.
4. P
REVALENCE OF
S
YMPTOMS IN
M
IDDLE
-A
GED
W
OMEN
: R
ELATIONSHIP
TO
H
ORMONAL
E
VENTS OF THE
M
ENOPAUSE
T
RANSITION AND
A
GING
A few studies have tried to address this question by
examining different symptom experiences for women
of different age groups and menopausal status.
Two studies compared symptom checklist results
for men and women of different age groups using
lists from general practices. Results were presented
by age groups rather than by menopausal status.
Bungay et al.,
25
in a United Kingdom postal survey,
found that four different patterns occurred by age
and sex. Peaks of prevalence of flushing and
sweating were closely associated with the mean
age of the menopause. Less impressive peaks of
minor mental symptoms were associated with an
age just preceding the mean age of menopause.
Complaints about aching breasts, irritability, and
low backache diminished after menopause. Male
and female curves were parallel for loss of
appetite, crawling or tingling sensations on skin,
headaches, difficulty with intercourse, indigestion,
constipation, diarrhea, shortness of breath, cold-
ness of hands and feet, dryness of skin, dryness
of hair, aching muscles, aching joints, feelings of
panic, feelings of depression, and stinging on
passing urine.
A Dutch national study
26
of the symptoms in the
Kupperman index experienced by men and women
aged over 25 years, reported female/male ratios for
each symptom. Only transpiration (excessive
sweating) showed a significant increase at age
45–54, compared to younger age groups and then
remained raised. No other symptom showed a signif-
icant increase in the age group 45–54, including the
General Health Questionnaire score of mental health.
Most observational studies using symptom check-
lists find that middle-aged women are highly
symptomatic. An Australian study
27
of women aged
45–54 found the symptoms most commonly expe-
rienced in the prior 2 weeks to be very dry skin
(68 percent), backache (49 percent), forgetfulness

Page 7
49
(47 percent), problems sleeping (39 percent), irri-
tability (37 percent), and mood swings (36 percent).
Hot flushes were reported by 25 percent of women
(rank order 10) and sweating attacks by 13 percent
(rank order 19). Vaginal dryness and discomfort
was reported by 16 percent (rank order 17).
As noted earlier, there is consensus about the
marked temporal relationship of vasomotor symp-
toms to menopause.
28
These begin to increase in
perimenopause, reach a peak within 1–2 years of
the FMP,
12
and remain elevated for up to 10
years.
29–31
McKinlay et al.,
32
in a followup study
over 4 years of 1,178 premenopausal women,
found increasing hot flushes—10 percent in early
premenopause, 30 percent in early perimenopause
increasing to 50 percent of women 1 year prior to
the FMP—coinciding with late perimenopause,
with reports of hot flushes starting to decline sig-
nificantly 2 years after FMP and reaching 20 per-
cent of women 4 years after FMP. Thus, hot flush-
es are not the most frequent symptoms reported,
nor are they pathognomonic of menopause, being
reported by younger menstruating women. A num-
ber of studies have shown an association between
hot flushes and night sweats,
33
and some show an
association between these vasomotor symptoms
and insomnia.
34
Women who had an artificially
induced menopause were more likely to still report
flushing than were naturally menopausal women
and to report more symptoms.
34
Only a few studies
included any reported measure of dryness of the
vagina. Oldenhave reports that dry vagina
increased in the perimenopause to postmenopause,
with a slight decrease > 10 years postmenopause,
which may be explained by lack of a partner.
31
This
complaint is related to hot flush reporting. There
was less consistency regarding other symptoms.
A number of cross-sectional studies, including the
two Ede studies,
29,31
report a small but transient
increase in nonvasomotor symptoms in peri-
menopause. There was no attempt to differentiate
whether any increase in such symptoms is due to
distress caused by vasomotor symptoms. A
Norwegian 5-year prospective study found that
vasomotor symptoms, vaginal dryness, heart palpi-
tations, and social dysfunction increased with the
menopausal transition, but that headache and
breast tenderness decreased.
35
However, these
results were based on only 59 of the 200 pre-
menopausal women selected for the study. The
author notes that the finding of heart palpitations
must be treated with caution since it differs from
all previous factor analytic studies.
35
Recently
released results from the cross-sectional phase of
the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation
(SWAN) study have also found an increase in
vasomotor symptoms and in psychological and
psychosomatic symptoms related to menopause.
36
Analyses of data from 14,906 women aged 40 to
55 years found vasomotor symptoms burden on a
different factor to psychosomatic symptoms.
Perimenopausal and postmenopausal women, HRT
users, and women who had a surgical menopause
were all significantly more likely to report vaso-
motor symptoms compared to premenopausal
women, with postmenopausal women having the
higher OR. Psychosomatic symptoms (tense,
depressed, irritable, forgetful, headaches) were
reported more often by perimenopausal women,
hormone users, and women with a surgical
menopause than by premenopuase or post-
menopausal women. A number of other studies,
including recent longitudinal studies using validat-
ed mood scales, have not found an association
between mood and menopausal status.
37
The Melbourne Women’s Midlife Health Project
reported on the analysis of those women who after
7 years of followup had progressed through the
menopause transition. Annual measures included a
33-item symptom checklist. Increasing significantly
from early to late perimenopause were the total
number of symptoms, hot flushes, night sweats, and
dry vagina. Breast soreness/tenderness (mastalgia)
decreased significantly with the menopause transi-
tion. Trouble sleeping showed a smaller increase,
which was found to in part reflect bothersome hot

Page 8
50
flushes.
38
(See figs. 3–1 to 3–5.) The onset of hot
flushes was found to be related to decreased estra-
diol levels (p < 0.01), and the onset of night sweats
was related to the change
in estradiol level (p <
0.05).
38
Interestingly, breast
tenderness was not includ-
ed in the SWAN study
reported above. The
SWAN study found that
vaginal dryness was related
to vasomotor symptoms
but did not reach the crite-
ria for inclusion in the fac-
tor analysis, and results
were not reported by
menopausal status.
36
Longcope et al.
39
also report a significant negative
association of hot flushes with estrone and
estradiol levels amongst their sample of 241
Massachusetts women followed for 3 years. Thus,
a number of epidemiological studies have found
that only vasomotor and vaginal atrophic symp-
toms significantly increase as women pass through
the natural menopause transition.
Although many theories have been suggested to
explain the mechanism of menopausal flushing,
none provide a satisfactory explanation.
40
Core
body temperature elevations precede the
menopausal hot flush and serve as one trigger of
this heat loss phenomenon.
41
What is responsible
for the core temperature elevation is a matter of
speculation. Although vasomotor symptoms are
associated with increasing FSH and decreasing
estradiol levels,
38,42
it may be that vasomotor symp-
toms relate to the activity of another substance, in
whose absence the activity of the thermoregulatory
center is disturbed.
42
This substance may be com-
mon to both ovaries and testes and explain the fact
that the male flushes after orchidectomy and the
woman after ovarian failure. Each hot flush is
accompanied by a gonadotrophin-releasing hor-
mone (GnRH) pulse with a consecutive episode of
FSH and LH secretion.
43
Because hypophysec-
Epidemiological studies
have found that only
vasomotor and vaginal
atrophic symptoms
significantly increase
as women pass through
the natural menopause
transition.
F
IGURE
3–1
Proportion of Women Bothered by Hot Flushes by Menopausal Status
1.00
0.75
0.5
0.25
0
Pre
Early
Peri
Late
Peri
Post
+1 yr
Post
+2 yr
Post
+3 yr
Proportion
pre = premenopausal
early peri = change in menstrual frequency
late peri = 3–11 months amenorrhoea
post 1 year = 12–23 months amenorrhoea
post 2 years = 24–35 months amenorrhoea
post 3 years 36 months amenorrhoea

Page 9
51
F
IGURE
3–2
Proportion of Women Bothered by Night Sweats by Menopausal Status
1.00
0.75
0.5
0.25
0
Pre
Early
Peri
Late
Peri
Post
+1 yr
Post
+2 yr
Post
+3 yr
Proportion
pre = premenopausal
early peri = change in menstrual frequency
late peri = 3–11 months amenorrhoea
post 1 year = 12–23 months amenorrhoea
post 2 years = 24–35 months amenorrhoea
post 3 years 36 months amenorrhoea
F
IGURE
3–3
Proportion of Women Bothered by Dryness of Vagina by Menopausal Status
1.00
0.75
0.5
0.25
0
Pre
Early
Peri
Late
Peri
Post
+1 yr
Post
+2 yr
Post
+3 yr
Proportion
pre = premenopausal
early peri = change in menstrual frequency
late peri = 3–11 months amenorrhoea
post 1 year = 12–23 months amenorrhoea
post 2 years = 24–35 months amenorrhoea
post 3 years 36 months amenorrhoea

Page 10
52
F
IGURE
3–4
Proportion of Women Bothered by Breast Soreness by Menopausal Status
1.00
0.75
0.5
0.25
0
Pre
Early
Peri
Late
Peri
Post
+1 yr
Post
+2 yr
Post
+3 yr
Proportion
pre = premenopausal
early peri = change in menstrual frequency
late peri = 3–11 months amenorrhoea
post 1 year = 12–23 months amenorrhoea
post 2 years = 24–35 months amenorrhoea
post 3 years 36 months amenorrhoea
F
IGURE
3–5
Proportion of Women Bothered by Trouble Sleeping by Menopausal Status
1.00
0.75
0.5
0.25
0
Pre
Early
Peri
Late
Peri
Post
+1 yr
Post
+2 yr
Post
+3 yr
Proportion
pre = premenopausal
early peri = change in menstrual frequency
late peri = 3–11 months amenorrhoea
post 1 year = 12–23 months amenorrhoea
post 2 years = 24–35 months amenorrhoea
post 3 years 36 months amenorrhoea

Page 11
53
tomized hypogonadotropic women experience hot
flushes in the same way as women with an intact
pituitary, vasomotor instability is induced by a
common higher cerebral center and not by the
gonadotropin-pulse. The vasodilatation occurring
during hot flushes leads to an increase of skin tem-
perature and finger volume and to an augmented
oxygen consumption.
44
Due to peripheral vasodi-
latation, there is an increase of the pulse rate by
about 15 percent. Body core temperature then
decreases. The increase of finger perfusion starts
1.5 min before the start of the hot flush and lasts
for several minutes after its subjective end. Serum
LH levels increase only after the beginning of
peripheral vasodilatation and reach their maximal
value approximately 12 minutes later. Most likely
as a consequence of the cooling down of the body
core temperature, an elevation of adrenocoticotropic
hormone (ACTH) and of human growth hormone
(hGH) occurs respectively 5 and 30 minutes after
the rise of skin temperature. Because hot flushes
occur not only after menopause, but also during
the down-regulation by GnRH analogues, the pri-
mary decrease of serum estradiol is essential for
vasomotor symptoms. Anorexia nervosa or other
conditions of hypothalamic amenorrhea do not
provoke hot flushes. Furthermore, hot flushes are
only observed in women previously exposed to
endogenous or exogenous estrogen activity. The
pathophysiological mechanism provoking hot
flushes involves catecholamines, catecholestrogens,
serotonin, histamine, endorphins, and prostaglandins.
The endorphin neurons are inactivated by low
estrogen levels, a phenomenon that is reversible.
5. R
OLE OF
P
SYCHOSOCIAL
AND
L
IFESTYLE
F
ACTORS IN
D
ETERMINING
W
OMEN
S
E
XPERIENCE OF
S
YMPTOMS
Cross-sectional studies have explored associations
between symptom experience and a large range of
other factors. In keeping with other studies from
Australia, North America, Scandinavia, and
Europe, an Australian study found lower symptom
experience in the midlife years to be associated
with increasing years of education, better self-rated
health, the use of fewer nonprescription medica-
tions, absence of chronic conditions, a low level of
interpersonal stress, not currently smoking, exer-
cise at least once per week, and positive attitudes
to aging and to menopause.
45
A previous history of premenstrual complaints was
reported to be associated with the occurrence of
vasomotor symptoms during menopause in cross-
sectional analyses of this population-based sample
of midlife women.
42,46
Longitudinal analysis of the
same cohort found that a prior history of both
physical and psychological premenstrual com-
plaints was associated with a more symptomatic
perimenopause characterized by dysphoria, skele-
tal, digestive, and respiratory symptoms.
47
The cross-sectional phase of the SWAN study
found that reports of vasomotor symptoms were
negatively associated with educational level and
self-assessed health and positively associated with
difficulty in paying for basics. Psychosomatic
symptoms decreased with age and were reported
less often by those with better self-reported health
and with less difficulty in paying for basics.
36
Longitudinal population-
based studies are best able
to establish the likely rela-
tionship between experience
of symptoms, psychosocial
and lifestyle factors. The
Massachusetts Women’s
Health Study found that
prior physical and psycho-
logical symptoms explained
physical symptoms, while
psychological symptoms were explained by low
education and perceived health.
6
A further analysis
of the 454 women from this sample who were pre-
menopausal at baseline and postmenopausal by the
Cross-sectional
studies have
explored associations
between symptom
experience and a large
range of other factors.

Page 12
54
6th followup found that variables related to greater
frequency of vasomotor reporting included a
longer perimenopause, more symptoms reported
prior to menopause, lower education, and more
negative attitudes to menopause prior to
menopause.
48
Symptom bothersomeness was relat-
ed to a greater frequency of vasomotor symptom
reporting, smoking, and being divorced. Variables
that predicted consultations were greater frequency
and bothersomeness of symptoms, higher educa-
tion, and greater health care utilization.
48
Women
with negative attitudes to menopause were more
likely to subsequently experience bothersome
symptoms.
49
A British study
50
found that women who had expe-
rienced an early natural menopause had a strongly
increased risk of vasomotor symptoms (hot flushes
or night sweats), sexual difficulties (vaginal dry-
ness or difficulties with intercourse), and trouble
sleeping. However, there was little or no excess
risk of the other somatic or psychological symp-
toms studied. In contrast, all types of symptoms
were more common among women who had had a
hysterectomy or were users of HRT. Using
prospective data collected when the women were
36, symptom reporting was predicted by low edu-
cation, stressful lives, or a previous history of poor
physical and psychological health. Adjustment for
these factors in a logistic regression model did not
affect the relationship between symptoms and cur-
rent menopausal status. For vasomotor symptoms,
postmenopausal women had an adjusted OR of 4.7
(95 percent confidence internval (CI) 2.6–8.5), and
perimenopausal women had an adjusted OR of 2.6
(95 percent CI 1.9–3.5) compared with pre-
menopausal women. Corresponding adjusted ORs
for sexual difficulties were 3.9 (95 percent CI
2.1–7.1) and 2.2 (95 percent CI 1.4–3.2) and for
trouble sleeping were 3.4 (95 percent CI 1.9–6.2)
and 1.5 (95 percent CI 1.1–2.0).
A postal survey of men and women aged between
49–55 years and registered with a London general
practice
51
found no gender differences in reporting
of self-rated health, life satisfaction, and health-
related quality of life, although women reported
more physical problems. Menopausal status was
not significantly related to life satisfaction or to
health-related quality of life. Significant predictors
of health-related quality of life were serious ill-
ness, employment, and marital status. Sample size
was relatively small in this study (n = 189),
response rate was only 47 percent, and the age
range may have meant that most women were
already in the menopausal transition.
Using structural modeling of data from the first 6
years of followup of the Melbourne Women’s
Midlife Health Project, the presence of bothersome
symptoms was found to adversely affect well-
being.
52
Repeated measures multivariate analysis of
covariance also found that bothersome symptoms
adversely impacted negative mood.
37
Greene
28
suggested a vulnerability model to explain
the role of psychosocial factors in symptom expe-
rience during the menopausal transition. The Greene
vulnerability model hypothesizes that adverse
psychosocial factors render women vulnerable to
develop nonspecific physical and psychological
symptoms at this time. Response to stress interacts
with personality and sensitivity to biological changes
to determine the actual symptoms experienced.
Hot beverages can cause flushing through counter
current heat exchange mediated through the ther-
moregulation center of the anterior hypothalamus.
Foods containing nitrites and sulphites and spicy
foods, such as those containing the active agent in
red pepper or capsaicin, may also provoke severe
flushing. Alcohol intake is also associated with
flushing reactions, although there are no controlled
trials examining the effect of alcohol intake on the
severity of menopausal symptoms, in particular
vasomotor symptoms. The mechanism of alcohol-
provoked flushing is complex but is probably related
to the fact that fermented alcoholic beverages con-
tain tyramine or histamine, which induces flushing.
53

Page 13
55
5.1 Exercise
It has been suggested that physical activity may
have a beneficial effect on reducing vasomotor
symptoms in menopausal women. Physical exer-
cise involving increased energy expenditure
increases hypothalamic β-endorphin production,
and β-endorphins are reported to stabilize ther-
moregulation.
54
However, conflicting evidence
exists as to whether exercise has an effect on
menopausal symptoms.
In a cross-sectional study of a population-based
sample of 728 Australian-born women,
55
physical
activity had no significant effect on women’s expe-
rience of troubling symptoms, including those
symptoms associated with their menopausal status,
such as vasomotor symptoms. Hammar et al.
56
reported that women who participated in organized
physical exercise on a regular basis had a lower
prevalence of moderate to severe vasomotor symp-
toms compared with women of the same
menopausal status from the population. A further
study by these researchers
54
reported that from a
population of 793 women, only 5 percent of highly
physically active women experienced severe vaso-
motor symptoms as compared with 14–16 percent
of women who had little or no weekly exercise.
The latter study collected data on physical habits
and on current and previous experience of vasomo-
tor symptoms. There is the risk of women overesti-
mating the time spent in physical activities as well
as the problems of retrospective reporting of vaso-
motor symptoms. A prospective or intervention
study would avoid these problems. However, the
fluctuating nature of the experience of vasomotor
symptoms and the expectations of participants
could affect such studies. A case-control study
57
(82 cases and 89 controls) found that habitual
exercise prior to the FMP did not reduce the likeli-
hood of experiencing vasomotor symptoms during
the perimenopause.
6. E
FFECTIVEMESS OF
T
REATMENT
I
NTERVENTIONS FOR
S
YMPTOMS
L
INKED TO THE
T
RANSITION
T
O
M
ENOPAUSE
Available treatments aimed at reducing symptoms
related to the menopausal transition include HRT,
phytoestrogens, and natural therapies, which have
been shown to possess different degrees of efficacy.
6.1 Hormone Replacement Therapies (HRT)
Most RCTs of HRT have been carried out on post-
menopausal women, many of whom have already
received HRT and may have undergone a surgical
menopause. Nevertheless, there is considerable
consensus in findings that the symptoms which
consistently respond to HRT are the vasomotor and
vaginal atrophic symptoms. These beneficial
effects of HRT persisted after adjusting for base-
line symptom level and uterine status.
58
There is a substantial body of
evidence showing that HRT is
effective in reducing hot flushes.
Randomized double-blind place-
bo controlled trials have report-
ed that CEE at dosages of 0.3,
0.625, and 1.25 mg/day signifi-
cantly reduced hot flushes com-
pared with placebo.
59–61
Similarly, other preparations of
estrogen, administered either orally or by transder-
mal patch, have also shown effectiveness in the
relief of vasomotor symptoms.
62–70
Gordon et al.
67
compared the efficacy of estradiol patches and oral
conjugated estrogen and found no statistically sig-
nificant difference between the preparations with
regard to their effect on the reduction of hot flush-
es. The response to the 0.1 mg estradiol patch was
greater, and the response to the 0.05 mg estradiol
patch was less than the response to conjugated
estrogens, although these differences were not sta-
tistically different. Percutaneous estradiol delivered
in an alcohol-water gel has been reported to be
effective in treating vasomotor symptoms.
71
The
Conflicting
evidence exists as
to whether exercise
has an effect
on menopausal
symptoms.

Page 14
56
use of either continuous or sequential progestins
with estrogen does not reduce the efficacy of the
preparation in the reduction of hot flushes.
58,65,72
Recently, an intranasal 17β-estradiol spray has
been shown to be significantly better than placebo
and similar to oral estradiol in reducing hot flushes
and is also well tolerated.
73
Vaginal symptoms
related to atrophy
have been reported
to be alleviated by
ERT. Local low-dose
treatment with a
small vaginal tablet
of 25 micrograms
of 17β-estradiol
was shown to significantly relieve postmenopausal
symptoms related to vaginal atrophy when com-
pared to placebo.
74
Preparations of estradiol vaginal
cream have a similar effect
75
and also result in an
increase in plasma levels of estradiol. Percutaneous,
transdermal, and oral estradiol treatments have all
been reported to improve the vaginal cytology pro-
file in comparison with placebo therapy.
67,71,76
Sleep
disturbances do not appear to be helped by trans-
dermal or oral ERT.
69,77
The benefits and risks of
HRTs are discussed in other chapters.
A number of nonestrogen preparations have been
evaluated for their effects on menopausal symp-
toms with varying results. The progestational agent
megestrol acetate (20 mg twice daily) has been
reported to significantly decrease the frequency of
hot flushes in women with a history of breast can-
cer.
78
Veralipride, an antidopaminergic treatment,
reduced vasomotor symptoms and was significant-
ly more effective than placebo in three trials.
79–81
Other dopamine agonists and antagonists have also
been found to be more effective than placebo in
alleviating hot flushes.
78
In one trial, opipramol
treatment was reported as being significantly better
than placebo in reducing hot flushes.
82
Trials with
clonidine,
83
propranolol,
84
and dong quai
85
have
shown these treatments to be no more effective
than placebo in controlling hot flushes. Dong quai
did not have any effect on vaginal cell matura-
tion.
85
More promising results for non-hormonal
treatment of hot flushes have come from trials of
antidepressants, particularly the selective serotonin
reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and related drugs such
as venlafaxine. Pilot studies presented at confer-
ences have found significant reduction in hot flush
frequency and severity, but evidence from larger
double-blind randomized trials is needed.
86
Studies of the effects of HRT on mood, cognitive
and sexual functioning are discussed elsewhere.
The symptom of breast soreness/tenderness
(mastalgia) has been shown in clinical trials to be
related to estrogen/progestin balance.
58
The
Postmenopause Estrogen/Progestin Intervention
(PEPI) trial
58
found a significant reduction in mus-
cle and joint pain in women who adhered to estro-
gen- and progestin-containing regimes. This bene-
ficial effect on muscle and joint pain was not evi-
dent in intention-to-treat analyses. Aches or stiff
joints were reported by over 40 percent of women
in the Melbourne Women’s Midlife Health Project
at each phase of the menopause transition,
38
although there was no demonstrable variation with
the menopause transition. Given the prevalence
of these symptoms among middle-aged women,
further research is needed.
6.2 Phytoestrogens
Phytoestrogens are plant compounds that have a
close similarity in structure to estrogens. Evidence
for the effects of phytoestrogens on reducing
menopausal symptoms, hot flushes, and vaginal
dryness come from two main sources—observa-
tional studies and clinical trials. The first source is
from epidemiological data of populations who
have high dietary intakes of phytoestrogen com-
pounds and who have a very low rate of hot flushes
(for example, 5–10 percent of Japanese women
report hot flushes compared with 70–80 percent of
Western women).
87
Japanese women are reported
Considerable consensus in
findings that the symptoms
which consistently respond to
HRT are the vasomotor and
vaginal atrophic symptoms.

Page 15
57
to consume 20–150 mg/day of isoflavones
88
com-
pared to Western women, where less than
5 mg/day is consumed.
89
The second source is from placebo-controlled clin-
ical trials. Five studies
90–94
have reported improve-
ment in hot flushes after dietary supplementation
with phytoestrogens. In three of these studies,
90,93,94
there was no significant improvement in these
symptoms in subjects in the treatment compared to
the placebo group. In one study,
93
there was an
increase in urinary isoflavone excretion in the
placebo group. There was a strong negative corre-
lation between the level of urinary isoflavone
excretion and the incidence of vasomotor symptoms
in both treatment and placebo groups. This further
emphasises the problem with intervention studies
using naturally occurring dietary compounds.
There are problems with both sources of informa-
tion. Whether Japanese women do in fact experi-
ence a significantly lower frequency of hot flushes
has been challenged,
95
and there is no data from
this population on the prevalence of vaginal dry-
ness. Evidence from controlled trials is limited by
several problems—finding an effective control
group, as phytoestrogens are present in so many
foods that it is difficult to eliminate them from the
diet, and the fact that natural improvement of
menopausal symptoms occurs with time. Of five
studies that looked at changes in vaginal cytology
with and without phytoestrogen supplementation,
there was a significant improvement in three
instances
91,96,97
but not in two.
90,98
The variations in
response may depend on populations studied,
source of phytoestrogen, and study design, particu-
larly with respect to duration of exposure.
6.3 Natural Therapies
Evening primrose oil, containing gamma-linolenic
acid, has been evaluated as a therapy for treating
hot flushes and sweating associated with
menopause in a randomized, double-blind, place-
bo-controlled trial.
99
Although there is no good
scientific rationale for the use of this preparation in
treating hot flushes and although neither clinicians
nor the pharmaceutical industry have ever promot-
ed evening primrose oil for this purpose, there is a
current view among the lay public that it is effective
in the control of menopausal symptoms. Chenoy
and colleagues
99
reported that gamma-linolenic acid
provided by evening primrose oil offers no benefit
over placebo in treating menopausal flushing.
7. F
UTURE
N
EEDS
Clearly there has been a great deal of research
documenting the relationship of symptoms of the
menopause transition. In this section, we expand
on those areas that require further detailed studies.
In the field of observational studies, there is a
need for better documentation of the processes of
the natural menopause transition using prospective
investigations to distinguish menopause-related
changes from those of aging or disease. Design
features needed in these longitudinal epidemiologi-
cal studies are:
• Randomized population sampling including
minority women of the country concerned
• Baseline age 45 or less, so that women are more
likely to be premenopausal
• Symptom checklists which include all symp-
toms shown to vary directly (vasomotor, vaginal
atrophic, breast tenderness) or indirectly
(insomnia, mood) with hormonal change
• Validated measures of psychosocial and lifestyle
factors which may mediate hormonal effects
• Prospectively kept menstrual calendars so that
phase of the menopause transition can be deter-
mined without bias of retrospective recall
• Regular hormonal measures
• Power analysis for sample size, so that effects
of hormones and other factors can be delineated

Page 16
58
• Long-term followup until women are at least 10
years postmenopausal, so that longer term
effects can be studied, including the natural his-
tory of untreated symptoms
• Studies of different populations worldwide, rep-
resenting women from a broader array of racial-
ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds
In the field of treatment interventions, there have
been many RCTs of different forms of HRT on
symptoms, and larger studies are in progress. On
the other hand, there is a need for—
• Questionnaires validating phytoestrogen intake
against metabolic measures of metabolites in
different cultural settings before either RCTs or
observational studies of the role of phytoestro-
gens can proceed
• A larger RCT of phytoestrogen supplementa-
tions, including metabolic measures of metabo-
lite levels

Page 17
59
1
Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr. The MOS short-
form general health survey Reliability and validity
in a patient population. Med Care
1988;26(7):724–35.
2
Neugarten BL, Havighurst RJ, Tobin SS. The measure-
ment of life satisfaction. J Gerontol
1961;16:134–43.
3
Folkman S, Lazarus RS. An analysis of coping in a
middle-aged community sample. J Health Soc
Behav 1980;21(3):219–39.
4
Radloff LS. The Center for Epidemiologic
Studies–Depression scale: A self-report depression
scale for research in the general population. Appl
Psychol Mea 1977;1:385–401.
5
Dennerstein L, Helmes E. The menopausal transition
and quality of life: Methodologic issues. Qual Life
Res 2000;9(Suppl S):721–31.
6
McKinlay JB, McKinlay SM, Brambilla DJ. Health
status and utilization behavior associated with
menopause. Am J Epidemiol 1987;125(1):110–21.
7
Morse CA, Smith A, Dennerstein L, Green A, Hopper
J, Burger H. The treatment-seeking woman at
menopause. Maturitas 1994;18(3):161–73.
8
Avis NE, McKinlay SM. The Massachusetts Women’s
Health Study: an epidemiologic investigation of the
menopause. J Am Med Womens Assoc
1995;50(2):45–9, 63.
9
Kaufert P, Syrotuik J. Symptom reporting at the
menopause. Soc Sci Med – [E] 1981;15(3):173–84.
10
Kupperman H, Blatt M, Wiesbader H, Togashi S. Use
of the amenorrhoea and menopausal index in the
clinical evaluation of estrogenic compounds. Fed
Proc 1952;11:365.
11
Wright AL. On the calculation of climacteric symp-
toms. Maturitas 1981;3(1):55–63.
12
Holte A. Prevalence of climacteric complaints in a
representative sample of middle-aged women in
Oslo, Norway. J Psychosom Obst Gyn
1991;12:303–17.
13
Porter M, Penney GC, Russell D, Russell E,
Templeton A. A population based survey of
women’s experience of the menopause. Br J Obstet
Gynaecol 1996;103(10):1025–8.
14
Alder E. The Blatt-Kupperman menopausal index: a
critique. Maturitas 1998;29(1):19–24.
15
Blatt M, Wiesbader H, Kuppermann HS. Vitamin E
and climacteric syndrome. AMA Arch Intern Med
1953:792–9.
16
Neugarten BL, Kraines RJ. Menopausal symptoms in
women of various ages. Pyschosom Med
1965;27:266–73.
17
Greene JG. A factor analytic study of climacteric
symptoms. J Psychosom Res 1976;20(5):425–30.
18
Greene JG. Constructing a standard climacteric scale.
Maturitas 1998;29(1):25–31.
19
Van Keep Pam, Kellerhals, JM. The ageing woman.
About the influence of some social and cultural
factors on the changes in attitude and behaviour
that occur during and after the menopause. Acta
Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 1976;51:17–27.
20
McCoy NL, Davidson JM. A longitudinal study of the
effects of menopause on sexuality. Maturitas
1985;7(3):203–10.
21
Burger HG, Dudley EC, Hopper JL, Shelly JM, Green
A, Smith A, Dennerstein L, Morse C. The
endocrinology of the menopausal transition: a
cross-sectional study of a population-based sample.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80(12):3537–45.
22
Wheeler JM. A multivariate look at the menopause.
J Clin Epidemiol 1989;42(11):1029-30.
R
EFERENCES

Page 18
60
23
Lehert P, Dennerstein L. Statistical Techniques for the
Analysis of Change in Longitudinal Studies of the
Menopause. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2000.
24
Dennerstein L. Well-being, symptoms and the
menopausal transition (review). Maturitas
1996;23(2):147–57.
25
Bungay GT, Vessey MP, McPherson CK. Study of
symptoms in middle life with special reference to
the menopause. Br Med J 1980;281(6234):181–3.
26
van Hall E, Verdel M, van der Velden J.
“Perimenopausal” complaints in women and men:
a comparative study. J Womens Health
1994;3:45–9.
27
O’Connor VM, Del Mar CB, Sheehan M, Siskind V,
Fox-Young S, Cragg C. Do psycho-social factors
contribute more to symptom reporting by middle-
aged women than hormonal status? Maturitas
1994;20(2–3):63–9.
28
Greene JG. The cross-sectional legacy: an introduc-
tion to longitudinal studies of the climacteric.
Maturitas 1992;14(2):95–101.
29
Jaszmann L, van Lith ND, Zaat JC. The peri-
menopausal symptoms: the statistical analysis of a
survey. part A. Med Gynecol Sociol 1969;4:268–77.
30
Ballinger CB. Psychiatric morbidity and the
menopause; screening of general population sam-
ple. Br Med J 1975;3(5979):344–6.
31
Oldenhave A, Jaszmann L. The climacteric: absence
or presence of hot flushes and their relation to
other complaints. In: Schonbaum E, ed. The cli-
macteric hot flush. Prog Basic Clin Pharmacol,
Basel Karger 1991;6:6–39.
32
McKinlay SM, Brambilla DJ, Posner JG. The normal
menopause transition. Maturitas
1992;14(2):103–15
33
McKinlay SM, Jefferys M. The menopausal syn-
drome. Br J Prev Soc Med 1974;28(2):108–15.
34
Thompson B, Hart SA, Durno D. Menopausal age and
symptomatology in a general practice. J Biosoc Sci
1973;5(1):71–82.
35
Holte A. Influences of natural menopause on health
complaints: a prospective study of healthy
Norwegian women. Maturitas 1992;14(2):127–41.
36
Avis NE, Stellato R, Crawford S, Bromberger J, Ganz
P, Cain V, Kagawa-Singer M. Is there a
menopausal syndrome? Menopausal status and
symptoms across racial/ethnic groups. Soc Sci Med
2001;52(3):345–56.
37
Dennerstein L, Lehert P, Burger H, Dudley E. Mood
and the menopausal transition. J Nerv Ment Dis
1999;187(11):685–91.
38
Dennerstein L, Dudley EC, Hopper JL, Guthrie JR,
Burger HG. A prospective population-based study
of menopausal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol
2000;96(3):351–8.
39
Longcope C, Crawford S, McKinlay S. Endogenous
estrogens: relationships between estrone, estradiol,
non-protein bound estradiol, and hot flashes and
lipids. Menopause 1996;3:77–84.
40
Ginsburg J, Hardiman P. The menopausal hot flush:
facts and fancies. In: Berg G, Hammar M, eds. The
modern management of the menopause.
International Congress, Symposium & Seminar
Series. The Parthenon Publishing Group
1993;8:123–35.
41
Freedman RR, Woodward S. Core body temperature
during menopausal hot flushes. Fertil Steril
1996;65(6):1141–4.
42
Guthrie JR, Dennerstein L, Hopper JL, Burger HG.
Hot flushes, menstrual status, and hormone levels
in a population-based sample of midlife women.
Obstet Gynecol 1996;88(3):437–42.
43
Kronenberg F. Hot flashes: epidemiology and physiol-
ogy (review). In: Flint M, Kronenberg F, Utian W,
eds. Multidisciplinary perspectives on menopause.
Ann NY Acad Sci 1990;592:52–86; discussion
123–33.
44
Lock M. Ambiguities of aging: Japanese experience
and perceptions of menopause. Cult Med
Psychiatry 1986;10(1):23–46.
45
Freedman RR. Biochemical, metabolic, and vascular
mechanisms in menopausal hot flashes. Fertil Steril
1998;70(2):332–7.
46
Dennerstein L, Smith AM, Morse C, Burger H, Green
A, Hopper J, Ryan M. Menopausal symptoms in
Australian women. Med J Aust 1993;159(4):232–6.
47
Morse CA, Dudley E, Guthrie J, Dennerstein L.
Relationships between premenstrual complaints
and perimenopausal experiences. J Psychosom
Obstet Gynaecol 1998;19(4):182–91.

Page 19
61
48
Avis NE, Crawford SL, McKinlay SM. Psychosocial,
behavioral, and health factors related to menopause
symptomatology. Womens Health
1997;3(2):103–20.
49
Avis NE, McKinlay SM. A longitudinal analysis of
women’s attitudes toward the menopause: results
from the Massachusetts Women’s Health Study.
Maturitas 1991;13(1):65–79.
50
Kuh DL, Wadsworth M, Hardy R. Women’s health in
midlife: the influence of the menopause, social fac-
tors and health in earlier life. Br J Obstet Gynaecol
1997;104(8):923–33.
51
O’Dea I, Hunter MS, Anjos S. Life satisfaction and
health-related quality of life (SF-36) of middle-
aged men and women. Climacteric 1999;2:131–40.
52
Dennerstein L, Lehert P, Burger H, Dudley E. Factors
affecting sexual functioning of women in the mid-
life years. Climacteric 1999;2:254–62.
53
Guthrie JR. Diet and exercise: do they influence
health outcomes during the menopausal transition.
In: Aso T, ed. The menopause at the millennium.
Proceedings of the 9th International Menopause
Society World Congress of the Menopause;
Yokohama, Japan. Parthenon Publishing
2000:204–11.
54
Ivarsson T, Spetz AC, Hammar M. Physical exercise
and vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal
women. Maturitas 1998;29(2):139–46.
55
Guthrie JR, Smith AM, Dennerstein L, Morse C.
Physical activity and the menopause experience: a
cross-sectional study. Maturitas 1994;20(2–3):71–80.
56
Hammar M, Berg G, Lindgren R. Does physical exer-
cise influence the frequency of postmenopausal hot
flushes? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
1990;69(5):409–12.
57
Sternfeld B, Quesenberry CP Jr, Husson G. Habitual
physical activity and menopausal symptoms: a
case-control study. J Womens Health
1999;8(1):115–23.
58
Greendale GA, Reboussin BA, Hogan P, Barnabei
VM, Shumaker S, Johnson S, Barrett-Connor E.
Symptom relief and side effects of postmenopausal
hormones: results from the Postmenopausal
Estrogen/Progestin Interventions Trial. Obstet
Gynecol 1998;92(6):982–8.
59
Coope J, Thomson JM, Poller L. Effects of “natural
oestrogen” replacement therapy on menopausal
symptoms and blood clotting. Br Med J
1975;4(5989):139–43.
60
Sherwin BB, Gelfand MM. A prospective one-year
study of estrogen and progestin in postmenopausal
women: effects on clinical symptoms and lipopro-
tein lipids. Obstet Gynecol 1989;73(5 Pt 1):759–66.
61
Agnusdei D, Gennari C, Bufalino L. Prevention of
early postmenopausal bone loss using low doses of
conjugated estrogens and the non-hormonal, bone-
active drug ipriflavone. Osteoporos Int
1995;5(6):462–6.
62
Kicovic PM, Cortes-Prieto J, Luisi M, Milojevic S,
Franchi F. Placebo-controlled cross-over study of
effects of Org OD 14 in menopausal women.
Reproduction 1982;6(2):81–91.
63
Paterson ME. A randomised, double-blind, cross-over
study into the effect of sequential mestranol and
norethisterone on climacteric symptoms and bio-
chemical parameters. Maturitas 1982;4(2):83–94.
64
Nevinny-Stickel J. Double-blind cross-over study
with Org OD 14 and placebo in postmenopausal
patients. Arch Gynecol 1983;234(1):27–31.
65
Marslew U, Riis BJ, Christiansen C. Desogestrel in
hormone replacement therapy: long-term effects on
bone, calcium and lipid metabolism, climacteric
symptoms, and bleeding. Eur J Clin Invest
1991;21(6):601–7.
66
Marslew U, Overgaard K, Riis BJ, Christiansen C.
Two new combinations of estrogen and progesto-
gen for prevention of postmenopausal bone loss:
long-term effects on bone, calcium and lipid
metabolism, climacteric symptoms, and bleeding.
Obstet Gynecol 1992;79(2):202–10.
67
Gordon SF, Thompson KA, Ruoff GE, Imig JR, Lane
PJ, Schwenker CE. Efficacy and safety of a seven-
day, transdermal estradiol drug-delivery system:
comparison with conjugated estrogens and placebo.
The Transdermal Estradiol Patch Study Group. Int
J Fertil Menopausal Stud 1995;40(3):126–34.
68
Good WR, John VA, Ramirez M, Higgins JE. Double-
masked, multicenter study of an estradiol matrix
transdermal delivery system (Alora) versus placebo
in postmenopausal women experiencing
menopausal symptoms. Alora Study Group. Clin
Ther 1996;18(6):1093–105.

Page 20
62
69
Polo-Kantola P, Erkkola R, Irjala K, Pullinen S,
Virtanen I, Polo O. Effect of short-term transdermal
estrogen replacement therapy on sleep: a
randomized, double-blind crossover trial in
postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril
1999;71(5):873–80.
70
Utian WH, Burry KA, Archer DF, Gallagher JC,
Boyett RL, Guy MP. Tachon GJ. Chadha-Boreham
HK, Bouvet AA. Efficacy and safety of low, stan-
dard, and high dosages of an estradiol transdermal
system (Esclim) compared with placebo on vaso-
motor symptoms in highly symptomatic
menopausal patients. The Esclim Study Group. Am
J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181(1):71–9.
71
Kornafel KL, March CM. Estradiol gel in the treat-
ment of menopausal symptoms: a placebo-con-
trolled double-blind case study of efficacy and
safety. South Med J 1992;85(3):270–3.
72
Dennerstein L, Burrows GD, Hyman G, Wood C.
Menopausal hot flushes: a double blind comparison
of placebo, ethinyl oestradiol and norgestrel. Br J
Obstet Gynaecol 1978;85(11):852–6.
73
Studd J, Pornel B, Marton I, Bringer J, Varin C,
Tsouderos Y, Christiansen C. Efficacy and accept-
ability of intranasal 17 beta-oestradiol for
menopausal symptoms: randomised dose-response
study [published erratum appears in Lancet
1999;354:780]. Aerodiol Study Group. Lancet
1999;353(9164):1574–8.
74
Eriksen PS, Rasmussen H. Low-dose 17 beta-estradi-
ol vaginal tablets in the treatment of atrophic
vaginitis: a double-blind placebo controlled study.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
1992;44(2):137–44.
75
Dickerson J, Bressler R, Christian CD, Hermann HW.
Efficacy of estradiol vaginal cream in post-
menopausal women. Clin Pharmacol Ther
1979;26(4):502–7.
76
Campbell S, Whitehead M. Oestrogen therapy and the
menopausal syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynaecol
1977;4(1):31–47.
77
Thomson J, Oswald I. Effect of oestrogen on the
sleep, mood, and anxiety of menopausal women.
Br Med J 1977;2(6098):1317–9.
78
Loprinzi CL, Michalak JC, Quella SK, et al.
Megestrol acetate for the prevention of hot flashes.
N Engl J Med 1995;331(6):347–52.
79
Zichella L, Falaschi P, Fioretti P, et al. Effects of
different dopamine agonists and antagonists on
post-menopausal hot flushes. Maturitas
1986;8(3):229–37.
80
David A, Don R, Tajchner G, Weissglas L.
Veralipride: alternative antidopaminergic treatment
for menopausal symptoms. Am J Obstet Gynecol
1988;158(5):1107–15.
81
Melis GB, Gambacciani M, Cagnacci A, Paoletti AM,
Mais V, Fioretti P. Effects of the dopamine antago-
nist veralipride on hot flushes and luteinizing hor-
mone secretion in postmenopausal women. Obstet
Gynecol 1988;72(5):688–92.
82
van Lith ND, Motke JC. Opipramol in the climacteric
syndrome. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Maturitas 1983;5(1):17–23.
83
Salmi T, Punnonen R. Clonidine in the treatment of
menopausal symptoms. Int J Gynaecol Obstet
1979;16(5):422–6.
84
Coope J, Williams S, Patterson JS. A study of the
effectiveness of propranolol in menopausal hot
flushes. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1978;85(6):472–5.
85
Hirata JD, Swiersz LM, Zell B, Small R, Ettinger B.
Does dong quai have estrogenic effects in post-
menopausal women? A double-blind, placebo-
controlled trial. Fertil Steril 1997;68(6):981–6.
86
Gottlieb N. Nonhormonal agents show promise
against hot flashes. J Natl Cancer Inst
2000;92(14):1118–20.
87
Avis NE, Kaufert PA, Lock M, McKinlay SM, Vass
K. The evolution of menopausal symptoms.
Bailleres Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993;7(1):17–32.
88
Murkies AL, Wilcox G, Davis SR. Clinical review 92:
Phytoestrogens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1998;83(2):297–303.
89
Coward L, Setchell K, Barnes S. The antitumor
isoflavones, genistein and daidzein, in soybean
foods of American and Asian diets. J Agric Biol
Chem 1993;41:1961–7.
90
Murkies AL, Lombard C, Strauss BJ, Wilcox G,
Burger HG, Morton MS. Dietary flour supplemen-
tation decreases post-menopausal hot flushes:
effect of soy and wheat. Maturitas
1995;21(3):189–95.
91
Brezezinski A, Aldercreutz H, Shoul R. Short-term
effects of phytoestrogen-rich diet on post-
menopausal women. Menopause 1997;4:89–94.

Page 21
63
92
Albertazzi P, Pansini F, Bonaccorsi G, Zanotti L,
Forini E, De Aloysio D. The effect of dietary soy
supplementation on hot flushes. Obstet Gynecol
1998;91(1):6–11.
93
Baber RJ, Templeman C, Morton T, Kelly GE, West
L. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of an
isoflavone supplement and menopausal symptoms
in women [published erratum appears in
Climacteric 1999;2:vi]. Climacteric 1999;2:85–92.
94
Knight DC, Howes JB, Eden JA. The effect of
Promensil, an isoflavone extract, on menopausal
symptoms. Climacteric 1999;2:79–84.
95
Albery N. The menopause in Japan – Konenki Jigoku
(editorial). Climacteric 1999;2:160–1.
96
Wilcox G, Wahlqvist ML, Burger HG, Medley G.
Oestrogenic effects of plant foods in post-
menopausal women. Br Med J
1990;301(6757):905–6.
97
Dalais F, Wahlqvist M, Grehan M, Murkies A,
Medley G, Ayton R, Strauss B. Effects of dietary
phytoestrogens in postmenopausal women.
Climacteric 1998;1:124–9.
98
Baird DD, Umbach DM, Lansdell L, et al. Dietary
intervention study to assess estrogenicity of dietary
soy among postmenopausal women. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 1995;80(5):1685–90.
99
Chenoy R, Hussain S, Tayob Y, O’Brien PM, Moss
MY, Morse PF. Effect of oral gamolenic acid from
evening primrose oil on menopausal flushing. Br
Med J 1994;308(6927): 501–3.

Page 22
64